Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:46

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Inside Ukraine’s audacious drone attack on Russian air bases - CNN
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What is a good source for finding job candidates?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Filmmakers/Actors Vote On 21st Century Films - Dark Horizons
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russell takes win in Canada as Piastri and Norris collide - Formula 1
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
New study uncovers surprising physics of 'marine snow' - Phys.org
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.